That those words were the first uttered by the defeated challenger at the closing press conference says a lot about this match. I cannot recall a more sporting loser. The players managed to treat each other with the utmost respect throughout, and appeared to end as they began, friends and rivals. My guess is that Magnus Carlsen also left with higher regard for his opponent’s abilities.
by GM Jonathan Tisdall
Sergey Karjakin finally buckled under after another prolonged session of defensive tasks, losing the rapid play-off 1-3, thereby granting Magnus his best birthday ever. The Norwegian turned 26 and took his third ultimate title, but only after an unexpectedly harrowing ordeal that will undoubtedly make him rethink how to handle future matches.
The day’s drama long appeared to be a fast-action, nerve-jangling replay of the event’s running themes; Karjakin choosing to tackle trouble by volunteering to do some slow suffering, Carlsen battering him thoroughly, and the challenger somehow shambling to safety. The first game was not a heart-stopper, just a sensible tussle where Karjakin handled the position better than his clock. But things would heat up when Magnus got white.
— Jonathan Tisdall (@GMjtis) November 30, 2016
The miracle escape in game two was on a par with Sergey’s heroics in games 3 and 4, so high on the frustration scale it was hard to imagine Magnus shrugging it off. But insider reports claimed that the Norwegian remained calm and relaxed in the post-game break, an incredible performance in its own right, especially knowing how spectacularly furious he can be with himself. Official match commentator Judit Polgar found the result this dramatic:
Polgar: "Magnus may have lost the match in this game." #CarlsenKarjakin
— Tarjei J. Svensen (@TarjeiJS) November 30, 2016
Looking back, around and forward
For my part, this continuation of Karjakin’s near-indestructibility set off a series of internal Q&As. What exactly has been going on in this match? To my mind, it hadn’t made any sense.
People kept talking about this defensive performance of Karjakin’s being part of a brilliant plan; but surely this makes no sense whatsoever if you look at it closely – it only looks like a plan when it happens to be working. No one goes in to a contest of this type thinking – with their team of assistants – I’m going to play to his strengths, let him batter me repeatedly and endlessly, keep drawing lost positions, then hit him when he’s gone crazy with frustration. Because let’s remember, Karjakin was only a hair from being down one or two points after only four games, the closest of those calls coming with the white pieces. You don’t plan that. You can’t plan on surviving that.
Yes, he may well have planned a course of provocation, and envisioned a clear policy of total risk avoidance to increase his chances or Magnus’ frustration. But you cannot have absorbing punishment as a policy and goal. It is something you do when you must. Karjakin came to fight, not lead with his face.
What made it look like this was a good plan? Something that most commentators have been too polite to dwell on at length. It was working because the best technician in the world, maybe the best ever, was not winning won positions. There is a point where defensive genius becomes more the shocking bungling of winning chances.
Where has Magnus’ technique been during this match? He’d done some magicking of somethings from nothings, he’d even started with a lot more than nothing. He’d nurtured these to the very brink of victory. But only scored the full point once.
Another thing that was making the punishment absorption route look like a plan was another total mystery. Carlsen was winning every opening battle. Maybe not in the way we used to think of winning the opening, by unveiling some novel path to advantage. But he was never surprised and was generally the one posing questions. The only opening that arguably went wrong was the fateful game 9, but even there Team C steered the opening course, it was just a very poor choice, especially for the match situation. With Team K unable to dictate the battlefields, the path to eventual gradual punishment was short.
Where the million dollar preparation from Team K went remains an enigma. Maybe a whole series of unlucky candidates are going to find this out in March 2018. But Carlsen appeared the better prepared.
One other question occurred to me during all this musing – what will the effect of this match be on future Carlsen challengers? Will they feel encouraged by the apparent tarnishing of the champion’s greatest weapon, or is he just evolving as a player? Magnus often appeared to be playing – differently. He clearly had a policy of aiming for positions of greater complexity often, choosing sharper play – not just when growing frustrated during the match proper, but also at a critical juncture in the second rapid game, when he could have settled for a very comfy and ‘typically Carlsen’ grind. It often appeared that he preferred his chances vs Sergey in messy rather than technical play. But more on this later, especially since this question of style very much characterized the third tiebreak game.
This game showed why Magnus is the stronger player.
A broader range of ideas, more versatile, more dogged and aggressive.#CarlsenKarjakin
— Jonathan Rowson (@Jonathan_Rowson) November 30, 2016
Karjakin’s manager, Kirillos Zangalis, passed saddened but objective judgement after this break point. «Magnus played very good. Only playing defence is very difficult in any sport. Can’t win like this.»
Tarnished, evolving or what?
Well, I have had a pet theory. It doesn’t explain the mystery of the missing winning technique, but it might provide some indirect reasons.
To my mind, Magnus has been very methodically expanding his playing style over the past few years, more and more ready to play theoretical variations, and happier to play sharper and sharper positions. This year, especially in some rapid events, and even more so when angry, he has produced games and performances that remind me of the kind of extra level Fischer achieved over his near peers at the height of his powers, and which I thought signaled a looming quantum leap in strength. But this year has also been characterized by recurring bouts of sloppiness.
I think this has muddled the perception of how he has been developing as a player, and that this weird blend of greater ambition and versatility – and inattention – continued in pressure-cooker format in New York. If I had to place a bet, it would be on an even more rounded champion that starts to rebuild a record rating gap in 2017 as all the bits fall into place. All the more so since I think this near-brush with disaster that this match contained will provide many lessons.
Anyway, it took 15 games for Carlsen to take the lead in this match. Could Karjakin produce his patented playoff comeback miracles with black against Magnus? Early during the fourth tiebreak game, I saw a visibly relaxed Carlsen even smiling a bit. I always knew that his mental constitution was immense, but this was simply incredible. His batteries are charged by confidence, and there were now no negative thoughts left.
How long we will remember Qh6!#CarlsenKarjakin
— Mohamed Al-Medaihki (@almodiahki) November 30, 2016
Magnus knows how to leave an audience. If the short memory of disappointed chess fans is anything to go by, I imagine the swing back of delighted fans will be just as strong. With the prettiest ever finish to a title match, people should stop shouting about boredom and cowardice and rule changes for a while. This was, and now certainly will be, a match to remember.
The final press conference began with the gathered crowd singing ‘Happy Birthday’ to Magnus. The atmosphere was finally relaxed, which produced some interesting benefits; Magnus revealed all behind the dud 12th game, and Sergey spoke without a trace of a stammer – the tension had lifted.
«I would like to thank my opponent Sergey Karjakin for a great match,» Magnus began, and then paused as this was met with loud, prolonged applause. He then thanked the fans, sponsors and organizers, and noted that he knew this playoff would happen after the 11th game.
Magnus: «My main strategy was to be well prepared and in general to play well. Obviously there was more of an emphasis on the black games than the whites. From the 11th game the strategy was to go for tiebreak and try my luck there.»
Sergey: «I spent a lot of time preparing for Magnus but he was jumping to lots of openings. A few times I completely forgot my preparation and mixed up my opening, there were so many things to prepare. Maybe it was better to have a fresh head – maybe that was my mistake before the rapid games. I prepared much for both colors, but it was better to be in good shape – and I wasn’t.»
It was now clear that Magnus had gained a significant edge by deciding to focus on the rapids right after Game 11. While Karjakin had to prepare, Magnus could rest, burn game 12, and rest some more.
Magnus did not realize that rapid chess was statistically a bad choice. «I didn’t actually know what my score (50-50) against him was in rapid. The advantage was I didn’t really have to think about game 12 and he did, and I was feeling better towards the end of the match. And it was very refreshing to play a bit faster after all these weeks!»
Carlsen confessed to just how hard the match had been for him. «It was very tough. After game 8 and even before that. Though it was frustrating not to win some better positions I thought I was going to win but after 8 I had all sorts of negative thoughts in my head and it was very difficult to settle down.»
«I managed to find my joy in playing, and today it was fun to play – this is very important. I was in a very dark place in the middle of this match. I’m looking forward to the future.»
Sergey assured the press that he was planning another title shot. «Now, for sure I am going to rest a little bit. There are many tournaments (coming). I want to improve my play and I believe I will have another chance in the future.»
Despite the incredible drama, and how close it all was, there was still very arguably a clear gap between the players. Magnus’ loss came in the throes of blood-lust. To mount a new challenge Sergey will have to master the art of pressuring Carlsen consistently – game 9 was the closest this came to happening in the 16.
I have no doubts that Sergey Karjakin has won hordes of new supporters, not just for his gritty determination, but at least as much for his warmth and charm under stress that few of us can imagine. If there is another title chance, I’m sure we’ll be here to watch it. Meet up here again in two years time?